Why biometric technology is still not a complete replacement for passwords

A good security token is one that uniquely matches you and that no one can know, guess, or copy. This is why security experts suggest us to use long and random passwords to protect ourselves. However, it is not as easy as it seems as it becomes difficult to remember strong and unique passwords.

Biometric technology as we know it now is the most preferred technology to secure any place. It had to be counted that this is such a hassle-free method of security as compared to the passwords we have to remember. In Biometrics, our finger or thumb impressions not only make our work easier but are also unique in nature.

Furthermore, biometric technology took away the hassle of hacking, as it is no easier for someone to hack your fingerprints than it is to crack the pass code. Following best security practices, setting up strong passwords for different devices and then remembering them every time is no easier than with biometrics.

So, if the biometric system seems to be so much better in every department, why is there a need for improvement? Why isn’t technology still the amazing replacement for weird passwords?

First and foremost, it is a definite fact that biometrics will play an important role in future verification. But we need to understand that in the present times the system is not the cure for everything. There are still many issues that prevail that need to be addressed in order to make the technology completely impenetrable.

Many researchers in the world have said that it is absolutely not true that biometrics cannot be refactored because they tried to fool the fingerprint reader and successfully passed the digital scanner through some special glasses. In addition, the biometrics that were initially instigated keep all data stored on the server, rather than restrict the client, so it is not impossible to breach the security system in this case.

Last year it was reported that the Touch IDs of millions of government employees had been stolen, at the United States Office of Human Resource Management, which first raised doubts about the technology. After detecting the threat quickly, mobile companies quickly replaced the fingerprint system in devices by adding password protection followed by Touch ID.

This data breach made it clear that biometrics is not impeccable. In fact they have only avoided passwords. Counting in if someone can’t log in with their Touch ID can be very problematic, software companies ranging from Microsoft’s Windows 10 to Google’s Android also provide password tools to ensure that doesn’t happen. .

Hence, it is not recommended to rely on biometric authentication at the present time as it is very important to have a backup in the form of passwords. This process is called Multi Factor Authentication (MFA), where we can keep the biometric as one of the two-way security process while the other one is the password.

Biometrics is indeed a great method of verification but the technology is not yet completely error proof. Hence, it should not be taken as a one-time replacement for password but should be implemented along with it for better security.

Source by Fahad A. Khan

Leave a Reply

%d bloggers like this: