Draft Supreme Court ruling puts spotlight on Susan Collins



The BDN Opinion section operates independently and does not set newsroom policies or contribute to reporting or editing articles elsewhere in the newspaper or on bangordailynews.com.

Ethan: As a pro-choice Republican, where do you stand on the news that the Supreme Court is likely to strike down Roe v. Wade?

Phil: I understand the thinking behind the draft ruling. The right to abortion until viability was always on shaky ground as a constitutional protection. The controversy now unfolding illustrates why I believe a woman’s very personal decision should be codified in law by Congress. The fact that Congress may finally act, is the one silver lining.

Ethan: The constitutional protection is only “shaky” because our court was packed by a president who lost the popular vote (Donald Trump) and a U.S. Senate that refused to do its constitutional duty to consider a sitting president’s (Barack Obama) nominee. But if it is a law you want, call your friend Susan Collins. She claims she was duped, but on Wednesday she voted against beginning debate on a bill that would codify Roe in U.S. law.





Source link

Leave a Reply

%d bloggers like this: