Agricultural Security – Social, Economic and Political Factors


Agricultural Security – Socioeconomic and Political Factors

The nature of working on a farm and on security is to some extent determined by the fact that farming is often viewed as a way of life rather than a formal occupation or job. In many ways this is true, although the enormous amount of hard work and productivity of farming is not to be underestimated. The approach of farming being a way of life means that it does not have the framework or pressures that a typical businessman has to go through to reduce risk and reinforce a mindset of safety.

day care

In today’s world of work, except companies require certain types of day care, which they either provide, or make allowances for their employees in terms of time and cost. This is more likely to happen in agriculture.

Children or infants are likely to be cared for within the context of a working farm, which means that the parents and caregivers are physically part of the environment in which they are working. This is likely to lead to blurring of boundaries and potentially increased security. risk.

occupational health and safety law

While many steps have been taken in the workplace and in the factory regarding health and safety, many regulations exempt certain industries, including farming and agriculture. This is because it is often very difficult to formulate regulations in such a way that they are relevant to agriculture. Farming also tends to enforce coercion, and as such are often not legally enforceable.

cultural beliefs

Following the belief that farming is a way of life, many people believe that farming and all forms of agricultural work are by their very nature dangerous and unpredictable, and often little can be done to increase safety. Sometimes there is an assumption that the nature of risk has to be accepted. This can lead to either a sense of complacency, or just a belief that health and safety does not apply to agriculture in the same way and it does to other industries.

market forces

Farmers, perhaps more than anyone else, are subject to market forces in terms of prices for their products, and thus often view health and safety costs as something they cannot fix, and therefore this But the money is less likely to be spent.

self reliance

The nature of farming means that it is a very self-sustaining profession, with farmers relying heavily on their instincts, intuition and experience. This also means that there is self-sufficiency on risk assessment for any type of security concern, which can vary widely for fairly obvious reasons.

The lack of a formal risk assessment process, or the enforcement of health and safety legislation, does not mean that farmers are unprepared for awareness of the risks associated with their work. Conversely, many people are and are very careful in trying to minimize and avoid risk to person and property wherever possible.

This means that the issue of self-sufficiency makes their decision very personal, which at certain times simply will not be enough. They do not have the advantage of the very broad base of experience that typically dictates most health and safety laws, and use a risk model or risk assessment basis.



Source by Peter Main

Leave a Reply

%d bloggers like this: